A practical policy library for organisations setting clear rules and controls for the responsible use of artificial intelligence.
AI governance becomes operational when people understand what they may do, what is restricted, who is accountable and when approval or escalation is required.
The INTAI Governance Policy Library provides a modular foundation covering employee use, enterprise AI systems, third-party tools, development, procurement, risk, data, security, human oversight and assurance.
Organisations can adopt and adapt the policies relevant to their AI use, risk profile, regulatory obligations and existing governance arrangements.
Effective AI governance rarely comes from a single document. AI affects many parts of an organisation, from employee productivity tools and procurement decisions to customer-facing systems, automated decisions, data processing, software development and third-party technology.
A practical governance framework therefore needs a connected set of policies, standards, procedures and supporting controls that define how different types of AI activity should be managed.
The organisation-wide AI policy normally sits at the centre of this structure. It establishes the principles, scope, responsibilities and minimum requirements that apply across the organisation.
Supporting policies then provide more detailed rules for particular areas such as employee use of generative AI, AI procurement, data protection, system development, risk assessment, human oversight, monitoring, incidents and assurance.
Where appropriate, these policies should connect directly to existing organisational frameworks covering information security, data protection, risk management, procurement, technology, records management, HR, legal review, compliance, audit and business continuity.
Policies should also distinguish between different levels of AI risk. A low-impact productivity tool used to draft internal content should not necessarily be governed in the same way as an AI system influencing employment, access to services, financial decisions, safety-critical operations or significant customer outcomes.
This is why policy design should be supported by an AI inventory, clear ownership, risk classification, approval routes and defined lifecycle controls.
The policy library below is therefore structured around the main governance capabilities organisations need to establish as AI becomes embedded across everyday work and enterprise systems.
Organisations do not necessarily need every policy on day one. The objective is to build a proportionate policy architecture that is understandable, enforceable and aligned with how AI is actually being used.
The following policy areas provide a practical foundation for governing AI across organisational use, technology, people, data, suppliers, risk and accountability.
Establishes the organisation’s overarching rules, principles, responsibilities and minimum governance requirements for artificial intelligence.
Defines how employees, contractors and other authorised users may use AI tools within organisational work.
Establishes practical rules for using generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Claude, Gemini and similar services.
Defines governance responsibilities, decision rights, oversight bodies and accountability across the AI lifecycle.
Establishes how AI risks are identified, assessed, classified, treated, monitored and escalated.
Requires organisations to identify and maintain an accurate record of AI systems, tools and material AI use cases.
Defines how AI systems and use cases are classified according to potential impact, regulatory exposure and organisational risk.
Establishes governance requirements for procuring, approving and managing third-party AI systems and suppliers.
Defines the governance requirements that apply when AI systems are designed, configured, developed, tested and deployed.
Establishes requirements for the data used by, processed through or generated by AI systems.
Defines how personal information may be used, entered, processed or generated through AI systems.
AI governance should operate alongside the organisation’s existing data protection framework.
Establishes security requirements for AI systems, integrations, models, data flows and connected infrastructure.
Align with existing information security, cybersecurity and incident management requirements.
Defines when human review, intervention, approval or override is required in AI-assisted and automated decisions.
Establishes when organisations should disclose the use of AI to employees, customers, users, regulators and other stakeholders.
Transparency requirements should reflect the nature and impact of the AI system.
Defines organisational requirements for identifying, assessing and managing unfair bias and discriminatory outcomes.
Defines when AI outputs and decisions must be capable of being explained, interpreted or meaningfully reviewed.
Establishes minimum requirements for testing AI systems before deployment and following material changes.
Establishes requirements for monitoring AI systems after deployment to identify deterioration, unexpected behaviour and emerging risks.
Defines how AI-related failures, harmful outcomes, control breaches and significant incidents should be identified and managed.
Defines the controls required when AI systems, models, configurations, integrations or material use cases change.
Significant changes should trigger proportionate governance and assurance review.
Defines the records and evidence that should be retained to demonstrate appropriate AI governance and decision-making.
Records support accountability, audit readiness and regulatory evidence.
Defines how applicable AI laws, regulations, standards and regulatory obligations are identified and incorporated into governance.
Defines when AI systems require additional assurance, independent challenge or formal review.
Defines the minimum knowledge, training and competency requirements for people using, managing, approving or overseeing AI.
Policies only create value when they are connected to real decisions, systems, people and operating processes.
Start with the organisation’s actual AI use, risk exposure, technology environment, regulatory obligations and existing governance framework rather than adopting every available policy.
Connect AI policies with existing information security, privacy, risk, procurement, HR, technology, compliance and records management frameworks.
Every material policy should have a named owner responsible for approval, implementation, interpretation, monitoring and periodic review.
Employees and managers should be able to understand the rules that apply to them without needing specialist legal, technical or governance knowledge.
Policies should be supported by approval workflows, access controls, system inventories, risk assessments, training, monitoring and escalation processes.
AI policies should evolve as organisational use changes, new technology is introduced, incidents occur and regulatory expectations continue to develop.
Turn insight into action with an INTAI AI Assessment .